Monday, June 8, 2009

The Union Label

I spent a couple hours on Friday lurking in the hallway of the United Auto Workers Local 600 office in Dearborn. While my wife was taking a test for a job with the Census Bureau, I looked at the many historic photos which lined the halls. There were the usual photos of presidents, governors, and mayors, shaking hands and greeting union members. The more powerful pictures, however, were those depicting the difficult and violent struggle which brought the UAW to power.

I knew some of the history, at least in a casual way. Seeing the photos of people dead in the streets of Detroit, union leaders with black eyes and bruised lips. Confrontations between Ford "security", and the union protesters. Tens of thousands marching in a funeral procession for five slain men, who died fighting for their right to organize. Henry Ford vowed that workers would unionize over his dead body.

It made me realize how much my generation and those that follow have taken for granted. We expect a standard work week, fair wages, benefits, and a safe work place. Many of us have forgotten that those were not provided by employers out of the goodness of their hearts. Blood was shed for those rights. People fought for those rights. Their sacrifice and struggle, provided the greatest growth of the middle class this country, and probably the world has known.

As I was growing up in the late 60's through most of the 70's, it was a given that our generation would be better off than our parents. A big part of the "American Dream" was rooted in that belief. The growth of the middle class fueled that economic expansion. The middle class grew in large part because of the success of unions in general, and the UAW in particular. Growing up in Detroit, I witnessed this first hand.

Auto workers, were able to buy nice homes, send their children to college, and even have small cottages up north as weekend getaways. The union pay and benefit package impacted workplaces throughout the region. Even in non union employers, higher wages, better benefits, time and a half pay on Sundays, were all offered because in a union market they were expected.

Every time I hear a talking head on television prattle on about the overpaid auto worker, I want to scream. When we have a healthy middle class, we have a healthy economy. Certainly unions are not perfect. They have created safety nets in some cases for those who were not deserving. I grew up surrounded by auto workers. The overwhelming majority worked at exhausting, demanding jobs. They worked in unbearable heat during the summer. Long hours were common for many. Were they paid well for people without education? Absolutely.

The slide of the auto industry is not due to the fact that we paid the workers too much. The auto industry in America for years simply did not engineer innovative or dynamic product. Instead of researching and innovating, they followed the path of least resistance and kept building big SUV's. Mostly because they were highly profitable in the short term. Higher profit, led to higher stock prices, which led to big bonuses to the CEO.

The other elephant in the room so to speak, is our abysmal health care system. The erroneous astronomical hourly rates that one often hears the auto workers make includes the company investment in health care benefits. Of course, it is difficult for American companies to compete with foreign competition, when every other advanced nation provides health care for it's citizens.
Until we remove the burden of heath care from employers, and develop a government program, we will always be at a competitive disadvantage.

The shrinking buying power of the middle class, I believe is in great part responsible for the economic mess we are in today. That shrinkage began with the weakening of the union movement. Through much of the Bush administration, poll after poll showed Americans were not satisfied, or confident in the state of the economy. I remember economists being puzzled, because all their indicators and measures showed growth. That growth we now know was a mirage. A mirage created by low interest rates, and increasing real estate values which created an illusion of wealth. This was no more real than a waterfall in the Sahara. We were refinancing our homes, taking "equity" out, and going on vacations, buying plasma televisions, and new cars using profit that had not in reality been earned.

We were playing with the houses money, but the house was broke. Some of us could see the problem looming, even if we did not have a p.h.d in economics. Incomes were stagnant or dropping, except for the top one percent. I kept thinking about the "value" of my home and thinking how out of line that was. Especially as everyone insisted that the value could only go up. My house, is essentially a "starter" home and I thought no way could this be worth $250k in a few years. It makes me wonder how the p.h.d crowd failed to see this.

Republican senators say we must lower the pay of the American worker, to compete with the world. How about this for an idea. Let's try to make the rest of the world pay a decent wage to it's workers. Put a health care system into place that removes the burden from our industry. Most of all make sure that wealth grows in all segments of the economy. Trickle down has been utterly discredited. It is time we realize that prosperity spreads from the bottom up. The union isthe greatest tool that the American worker possesses to achievie a decent living. We should never discredit that or take it for granted.

5 comments:

  1. A very meaty, weighty and dense (as in density, not stupidity) posting. Lots to think about.
    Membership in the Directors Guild of Canada taught me how unions could protect workers from exploitation. Per my contract, a day was 15 hours, with overtime after that. We had to be given a minimum of 8 hours off between work days from the time we left set until we returned. Never mind that we sometimes had an hour or more of travel each way. We were to be given a half-hour lunch break (but impromptu meetings usually occured then). Imagine what my work life would have been like if I had not been in a union?

    A film set has members of 5-6 different unions working together. Most of the other unions had stronger contracts than ours, and they were paid more. But it was understood that we were working our way to the top; supposedly, we were going to become Directors and Producers and our sacrifices would pay off. Also, Assistant Directors & Locations Managers have always been the backbone of production, have always worked the craziest hours, have always gone without sleep. Tradition plays its part.

    So I can't say I took for granted "a standard work week, fair wages, benefits, and a safe work place". But then, I chose the job.

    It ia a nomadic industry. Our union representatives could not simply dig in their heels and demand a better contract. If we were too out of line, a producer could just decide to take his/her production elsewhere -- say, North Carolina. It happened.

    I'm grateful for the protection (such as it was) my contract gave me against exploitation.

    Enough about that.

    Now...we may not see eye-to-eye on the following. I'm not sure.

    I take issue with the word "growth" (in general, not your use of it). Bigger, better, more. Why?I'm not so naive as to not understand that, economics being what they are (or have become), things fall apart if there isn't economic growth. But that our entire Western society's economic health relies on rampant consumerism confounds me. It's kind of like the concept of war: I know it works that way, but I don't like it. And I know that it probably can't be changed.

    Remember after 9/11, when the stock markets flat-lined, and Bush et al said 'Go shopping'? Seems like a pretty flimsy thing on which to build an economy. I don't get our society's values. How did we get ourselves in this position?

    I've been shaking my head at the whole credit crisis too. I don't understand the need for so much stuff. Why do people believe that they are suffering if the DON'T have that plasma TV and the SUV and the house with 5 bathrooms? I've never lived extravagantly, never made a lot of money (in spite of my contract), only owned a house for a year-and-a half (pre-divorce). I drove my last car for 17 years, showroom to scrapyard. I live in a small one-bedroom suite in a nice house, in a nice neighbourhood. And, most of the time, I'm okay with that. I don't understand the need to constantly acquire or upgrade posessions. I guess I'm damaging the economy.

    But we sell people the perfect picture of success, and they see themselves as failures if they don't have 'it' all. So, perhaps we get what we deserve, for not challenging the status quo.

    Coming from a country where government-provided healthcare is considered a pillar of our nation, I can only agree that it is necessary in your country. The interesting, and new, concept for me is how that would remove the burden of that enormous expense from the employer. Never thought of that (because, of course, it's mostly a moot point here.) But then, your government has to find the funds, and it's already spent its allowance: Iraq, and Fannie Mae (Billy Jack, Sweet Georgia Brown - whatever it is). Nothin' left in the cookie jar. Hope, for your sake, Obama can scrape a few crumbs together.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Certainly the type of workplace rules, wages and othere specific work issues can vary with the type of career. I think the UAW was more successful at it's peak than any other union. Walter Reuther, was a brilliant tactician, that was certainly a factor.
    Unions have been less effective in some fields. I know that when I was young and working at Hudson's Department Store, I tried to organize a union(you may remember the parade). The UFCW was attempting to organize, and I spoke at meetings and tried like hell to get them in there to no avail. partly because as I mentioned in the post, alot of the protections were already in place, because of the strength of the UAW. So many people did not feel they needed a union. Of course, a little while later they stopped paying time and a half on
    Sunday. The medical plan got weaker. Little by little it became a lesser place to work.

    I'm not sure we really disagree on the growth issue. My point had more to do with basic economics. If you are manufacturing things, and nobody has the money to buy these things, then nobody makes money.

    Now if you are talking about the sizes and quantity of these things we want to buy that is a different story, and I certainly see your point there.

    We started building these mega houses in the early 90's. The new burbs which sprouted up, were now full of these 3000-4000 square foot homes. I mentioned that the home I live in is what would these days be called a starter. Ginny bought when she was a single mom, because it was the most affordable she could find in a good school district. There are just the three of us (plus 2 cats & a bird), 1000sq ft. and 1 bath. It is tight. We had the house for sale when Emily was diagnosed, that stopped that. The thing is as much as we complain about being too small a house, the original owners raised six kids.

    To your main point... did we get out of control? Certainly. I actually made a living off that excess. I sold $8000 refrigerators, and 10,000 stoves for a living. Did anybody need those? Hell no the good old GE stove can cook your food, and the fridge can keep the Molson cold:). That does not mean, however, that I wouldn't have wanted one of those fancy stoves if I could have afforded one.

    As I think about it, it may just be a generational thing. Like I mentioned, us, i.e the baby boom generation took things for granted. My dad's generation lived the depression, and had to fight for the rights the union brought. To a degree, I think that overspending on big flashy things, may just be that American Dream thing again.

    Technology allows us to have it better than our parents generation, but again it is not better in the real sense only flashier. Bigger TV, fancier house, big honking stove, and marble showers.

    So I don't run out of space, just a final thought about the health care issue. Can't find the exact amount right now, but healthcare cost add about $2200 cost to an American car. I don't understand why they just don't throw some type of corporate tax out there to pay for health care. A certain percentage tax levied against corporations of a certain size. The tax would have to be far less than the current health care cost. Plus it would be a fixed expense that could be planned for. Right now costs are escalating out of control. I'm sure there must be a reason it wouldn't work, it just seems logical to me.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wanted to come back to this for a minute (or 4,096 characters). I feel like I didn't address/acknowledge your point -- that unions were hard fought for, and sacrifices were made, that ultimately brought better lives to many people, which resulted in the rise of the middle class and economic growth. Close?

    (Don't you have labour laws to ensure things like time-and-a-half on Sunday? Where is the government in all this?)

    When does anyone ever have "enough"? You mention workers who could buy a house AND a cottage. Why isn't the house enough? My grandparents never owned a house until they were in their 60's -- a 1-room cottage with no electicity or running water, that they planned to fix up for retirement. And they raised 5 kids. What is enough?

    Not to mention $10,000 stoves. I could never own one even if given to me. I would be overwhelmed by guilt. I am disgusted by our excess. (Sorry. I know it was your line of work. Well, mine was helping to make multi-million-dollar dreck, although some of it may have had redeeming social value, I suppose...) A few years ago, I held a small fundraiser for a woman who was going to South Africa to work with children who had been orphaned by AIDS. I became acutely aware of their living conditions, and it has remained my frame of reference. When I see photographs of people with so much less than us, who are smiling and happy, I think, "They've got something we don't: Joy."

    In North American society, we will never have enough, no matter our working conditions or healthcare plans, because we've lost the ability to live.

    (Having said all that, I don't think owning a house is decadent. Yours sounds like exactly the house I always hoped to own. Is it a post-war bungalow? I have friends who are raising their 2 girls in one in Vancouver. Tiny. They have a great life.)

    (Hope this posts.)

    ReplyDelete
  4. First as to the labor laws. I believe the only time and a half guarantee is for over 40 hours. Sunday regulations went out with the laws allowing Business to open on Sunday. (Are businesses still closed in CA on Sunday? ) I think that is still the case in Windsor, not sure if that in nationwide.

    Your point about materialism is a different issue. I don't disagree with you. My point about the cottages was more a matter of financial comfort level, and not so much that it was a need denied. The fact was auto workers had the extra cash, they could live comfortably, with money in the bank, send the kids to college, and retire rather than being carried out of work. Not living paycheck to paycheck is a valuable thing.

    So while I don't necessarily support the excesses,
    I do think the fact that more Americans could spend carelessly was a plus. The last decade has seen a return to the age of the Robber Baron.

    "As THE WALL STREET JOURNAL reported, a recent study found that the top .01% or 14,000 American families hold 22.2% of wealth — the bottom 90%, or over 133 million families, just 4% of the nation's wealth."

    That type of disparity has not been seen in nearly a century.

    My house is a 50's ranch, with beautiful hardwood throughout the main floor. Finished knotty pine paneled basement,(my home away from home :) ), and not enough closet or storage. Plus a kitchen that stifles my gourmet tendencies, and desire to own every kitchen gadget ever invented.

    Anyway, enough for now.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow. A basement. What a concept :)

    Your stats re: who's got the bucks just make me shake my head. Unbelievable.

    We agree on the need for some degree of financial security. For most of my adult life, I have not had it. I think I mentioned once that I have more $$ security now on disability than most of my adult life. It might not be a whole lot, but at least I can budget. Ironic. Working in an industry that was project-based meant that I never knew how long it would be between gigs. There'd be money in the bank after a show, but I'd have no idea how long it had to last. To make matters worse, my ex was also in the business. It was a huge leap of faith when we bought our townhouse. We definitely took the bank up on its offer of a line of credit. Didn't use it a lot, but it provided a measure of security. Also, back then, we could claim unemployment benefits from the government. (When I became incorporated in 1997, that changed.)

    So, yes, I can appreciate the concept of a steady paycheque, and of financial security.

    An aside: I am not so 'disabled' that I can't work. It's sort of that I don't want to. When I bought my disability policy (and I was considered self-employed since I was incorporated & a 'contractor') I paid extra for a ryder to insure me for my own profession. Since I could potentially risk a relapse if I went back to my film work, the insurance company has no choice but to pay me. (At least until I'm 65; that's when I become a bag lady :)) If I hadn't purchased that ryder, they could have come back after two years and insisted I get a job, or retrain. (And there really isn't anything else I'd like to do.) A 'lucky break' that came out of an unfortunate situation. The other lucky break is that, since I paid the premiums from my own bank account and not my company's, all of my benefits are TAX-FREE! (When I found that out, I actually wept; I was owed a refund of over $5,000.) Because my tax return shows $0 income, I don't pay healthcare premiums and my prescription drugs are covered. And even though, technically, I don't have any income, I still get the GST rebates. Sweet. (In a perverted way.)

    As for labour laws, you're right: People in Canada probably don't get paid time-and-a-half on Sundays anymore. (Yes, stores and everything else are open on Sunday. Kinda sad. Gone are the days of the Sunday roast beef family dinner.) I was so outside the norm in my profession. No idea what the labour laws are.

    p.s. Your house sounds great. Sorry about the kitchen :)

    Movin' on.

    ReplyDelete